The goverment should make the guns illegal -Con PowerPoint Presentation

The goverment should make the guns illegal -Con - PowerPoint Presentation Example As such, the rates of criminal activities associated with guns will reduce as much as possible. This may be critical in ensuring safety, peace and developments in the country, thereby translating to strong economy. There are several reasons to support the issue of making the guns illegal. It is of crucial importance to note that ownership of guns is closely associated with criminal activities. For instance, most criminal activities like robbery, rape as well as suicides are always eased through the use of guns (Streissguth, 74). Making the guns illegal is the safest bet to thwarting issues of insecurity. Making the ownership of guns illegal is essential since it will reduce the chances of criminals, school bullies as well as other hooligans from accessing guns. This will prevent massive fatalities associated with such acts. Making the guns illegal limits the possibilities of guns being in the hands of children (Lott, 75). This helps in limiting the chances of gun bullying that may result to deaths of innocent individuals. In addition, the restriction to gun ownership will greatly reduce the chances of people committing passion suicide following situational stresses (Whitney, 57). Therefore, any move to make the guns illegal is critical in managing, preventing as well as minimizing such crime related activities involving the usage of guns. This is crucial in bringing peace as well as safety to the lives of individuals. This follows that illegalizing of guns is key in heightening security issues as well as minimizing criminal related activities involving the use of

Is there global convergence in corporate governance and why Essay

Is there global convergence in corporate governance and why - Essay Example This research paper is focused on convergence corporate governance practices among business firms and tries to determine the primary reason behind it. Paul (2005) mentioned in his study that firms belonging to different cultural background follow different organizational practices. The cross cultural difference in organizational behaviour has been studies by Hofstede, Wedel and Steenkamp (2002), where he stated that people belonging to different cultural background possesses different psychological profile, which is the key determinant behind variance in governance structures in the organizations. However, Chan and Cheung (2012) contrasted that despite of the presence of cultural differences among the firms, there exists a uniformity among the corporate laws, which compels all the business firms to work under the same roof. Porta et al (1999) further added that the firms that operate in a multinational level deals with the financial standards and regulations of different countries. Therefore, it becomes a big hassle for them if different countries follow different standards. This as a result forced the multinational firms to agree upon a commonly used regulations and standards that eased the business activities of the firms. Coffee-Jr (1999) mentioned that the importance of protecting shareholder’s interests is also a vital determinant of the growing convergence of the corporate governance structures. This is mostly because the outside investors often face the risk of uncertainty in some countries where the expropriation of the minority shareholders by the controlling shareholders is extensive. Paul (2005) opined that the advent of globalization has created an open global business market where all the firms from different avenues perform their respective business activities. Therefore it is imperative that the firms